2070 Super Mobile Vs 3060 Mobile
RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs RTX 3060 Mobile
Toll now 1443$
Games supported 100%
Price now no information
Games supported 97%
General info
Comparison of graphics menu architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 41 | 101 |
| Value for money | 13.36 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU lawmaking name | N18E-G2R | GN20-E3 GA106 |
| Market place segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release appointment | 2 Apr 2020 (2 years ago) | four Jan 2021 (1 year ago) |
| Price at present | $1443 | no data |
Value for money
To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, simply for precise assessment you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 meg | 13,250 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 115 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill up rate | 220.8 | 171.0 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a time to come computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards information technology's notebook size, connectedness slot and bus, if the video carte is inserted into a slot instead of beingness soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe four.0 x16 |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its blazon, size, autobus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Annotation that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and use a shared part of organization RAM.
| Retention type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 14002 MHz | no data |
| Retentivity bandwidth | 448.0 GB/due south | no data |
| Shared retentiveness | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise merely for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no information |
| G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you lot demand some particular engineering science for your purposes.
API back up
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | no data |
| Shader Model | six.five | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.ii | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.two |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 8.half dozen |
Benchmark functioning
Non-gaming benchmark operation comparison. Note that overall criterion operation is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you observe some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually set up problems speedily.
- 3DMark eleven Functioning GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark eleven is at present superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for habitation PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just similar Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Tempest was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. Information technology utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to brandish a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Criterion coverage: 8%
Gaming functioning
Let'southward see how expert the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full Hd | 119 | 106 |
| 1440p | 77 | 70 |
| 4K | 45 | 44 |
Full Hard disk
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | 96 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 104 +148% | twoscore−45 −148% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla | 83 +9.ii% | 76 −9.2% |
| Battlefield 5 | 166 +295% | 40−45 −295% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 141 +236% | 40−45 −236% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 −48.3% | 86 +48.iii% |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60 −93.1% | 112 +93.1% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 111 +15.six% | 96 −15.six% |
| Forza Horizon four | 55−lx +38.1% | twoscore−45 −38.ane% |
| Hitman iii | 55−threescore −107% | 120 +107% |
| Horizon Goose egg Dawn | 118 +22.9% | 96 −22.9% |
| Ruby-red Dead Redemption 2 | 110 +162% | forty−45 −162% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120 +thirteen.two% | 106 −13.2% |
| Lookout man Dogs: Legion | 104 +28.4% | 81 −28.4% |
Full Hard disk
High Preset
| Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | ninety +114% | 40−45 −114% |
| Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 71 +10.9% | 64 −10.9% |
| Battleground 5 | 152 +vii.8% | 141 −7.8% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 121 +188% | 40−45 −188% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 −10.three% | 64 +ten.iii% |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60 −81% | 105 +81% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 104 +ii% | 102 −two% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−lx +38.1% | 40−45 −38.1% |
| Hitman 3 | 55−60 −96.half-dozen% | 114 +96.6% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 92 +nineteen.five% | 77 −xix.5% |
| Metro Exodus | 87 +6.1% | 82 −vi.one% |
| Red Expressionless Redemption two | sixty +7.1% | 56 −7.ane% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 110 +19.6% | 92 −19.half-dozen% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 163 +14.eight% | 142 −14.8% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 91 +28.2% | 71 −28.2% |
Total HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 63 +50% | 40−45 −fifty% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 61 +eight.9% | 56 −8.nine% |
| Battleground 5 | 141 +7.6% | 131 −7.6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−lx −10.3% | 64 +10.3% |
| Far Weep five | 105 +6.1% | 99 −vi.ane% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 94 +two.two% | 92 −2.2% |
| Forza Horizon iv | 55−60 +38.1% | 40−45 −38.1% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 87 +16% | 75 −16% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 61 +32.6% | 46 −32.vi% |
1440p
Loftier Preset
| Call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 75 +78.6% | 40−45 −78.6% |
| Hitman 3 | 55−lx −36.2% | 79 +36.ii% |
| Horizon Aught Dawn | 55−60 −5.2% | 61 +five.ii% |
| Metro Exodus | 54 +8% | fifty −eight% |
| Scarlet Expressionless Redemption 2 | 38 −5.3% | 40 +5.iii% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 73 +seven.iv% | 68 −seven.four% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Chase | 34 +0% | 34 +0% |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 56 +33.iii% | 40−45 −33.3% |
| Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 +twenty.8% | 48 −twenty.8% |
| Battlefield 5 | 110 +5.8% | 104 −v.eight% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−sixty +70.vi% | 34 −70.6% |
| Far Cry v | 55−60 −44.8% | 84 +44.8% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 89 +4.7% | 85 −four.7% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−lx +38.ane% | 40−45 −38.one% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 44 +29.4% | 34 −29.four% |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 42 +0% | 40−45 +0% |
| Hitman 3 | 55−60 +18.4% | 49 −18.4% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 55−lx +45% | 40 −45% |
| Metro Exodus | 32 +three.ii% | 31 −3.2% |
| Red Dead Redemption two | 25 +13.6% | 22 −xiii.six% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 37 −13.five% | 42 +xiii.5% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 59 +3.5% | 57 −3.5% |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 36 −16.7% | 40−45 +sixteen.seven% |
| Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla | 55−60 +427% | 11 −427% |
| Battlefield 5 | 63 +0% | 63 +0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 +287% | fifteen −287% |
| Far Weep v | 55−threescore +31.8% | 44 −31.eight% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50 +0% | 50 +0% |
| Forza Horizon four | 55−60 +38.1% | 40−45 −38.ane% |
| Lookout man Dogs: Legion | 25 +31.6% | 19 −31.half-dozen% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Functioning rating | 58.52 | 42.x |
| Novelty | 2 April 2020 | 4 Jan 2021 |
| Flake lithography | 12 nm | viii nm |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Urban center recommends
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
since it shows better operation.
Should you still have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer.
Cast your vote
Exercise you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Similar" push most your favorite graphics carte.
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile from AMD is Radeon RX 6800S, which is slower past xx% and lower by 44 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile:
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile past AMD
The nearest GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700S, which is faster by one% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile:
Like GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a calibration of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can enquire a question about this comparing, concur or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2070-Super-mobile-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060-mobile
0 Response to "2070 Super Mobile Vs 3060 Mobile"
Post a Comment